AIWE

Built for Canadian employers

Free estimate · 7–10 minutes · no sales call

Where is AI in your business?

Your employees are already using AI. This finds out where, with what, and what it would cost you.

This is an interview, not a quiz. It learns your business first, then asks about your estimator, your front desk, your managers — not “employees” in the abstract. What comes back is an estimate built on your answers: where AI is likely in use, where it meets your information, and what to do first.

  • The questions change based on what your company does. A dental practice and a construction company do not get the same interview.
  • Your exposure estimate is free: a score, findings, an exposure map of where AI meets your information, and the first three things to do. No sales call.
  • The Reality Gap Report is what your employees know. It finds which AI tools your team really uses, what company and customer information has gone into them, and how many people have never been told the rules — then checks every answer you gave against theirs. $149 CAD, refunded in full if too few of your team answer.

Built for Canadian employers. Canadian edition. “I don’t know” is an acceptable answer to every question.

How it works

  1. 01

    Your business

    2 minutes. We read your website and draft a profile; you correct it.

  2. 02

    Core questions

    The questions every company should be able to answer. “I don’t know” is always an option.

  3. 03

    Your exposure

    Scenarios specific to your kind of work. Where an answer raises a thread, we follow it.

  4. 04

    Your estimate

    Findings, an exposure map and the first three actions, from your answers. Free, and yours to keep.

  5. 05

    Your employees$149 CAD

    The Reality Gap Report. What your team actually does with AI, checked against what you believe. All ten actions, rebuilt on evidence.

The estimate · free

  • Exposure score and band, from your answers and your industry
  • Six control dimensions with findings and strengths
  • An exposure map: where AI meets your information, activity by activity
  • The first three actions, and the written controls the estimate points to
  • A PDF of the estimate

The Reality Gap Report · $149 CAD

  • The AI tools your team really uses, including the ones nobody approved
  • What has gone into them: company, customer and employee information
  • How many people have had guidance, and how many use AI without saying so
  • Your answers against theirs, line by line, each gap graded
  • All ten actions, in order, rebuilt on evidence, with the full PDF

How: one anonymous link for your team. Eight questions, about three minutes in all. No answer is ever shown on its own, only totals.

One payment, after you have seen your estimate. No subscription. Refunded in full if fewer than 3 of your team answer.

The score is an exposure score

Higher means more unmanaged exposure. Same answers, same score, every time — so you can measure it again next year.

Low

Emerging

Material

High

Critical

For advisersAccountants, brokers, IT providers and consultants: share this assessment with your clients and earn 15% of what they buy.

Get your referral link →

On the record

What Ottawa, the provinces and the courts have already said about AI at work.

Canada has no AI law of its own yet, but privacy law, provincial employment law and the courts already apply to how a business uses AI. These are the ones an employer in Canada should know. The summaries are ours; the originals are one click away.

From Ottawa

There is no federal AI law. The federal privacy law is being rewritten, and the privacy regulators have said how today's law applies to AI.

  1. Parliament of Canada

    Government of Canada

    Bill C-36 (45th Parliament, 1st session)
    Introduced June 15, 2026 · before Parliament

    The Protecting Privacy and Consumer Data Act, to replace PIPEDA's privacy rules

    Would replace the privacy part of PIPEDA, the federal private-sector privacy law, and give people a right to an explanation of an automated prediction, recommendation or decision with a legal or similarly significant effect on them. It does not regulate AI on its own; the earlier federal AI bill died in January 2025. It is a bill, not yet law.

    Read the original ↗
  2. Federal, provincial and territorial privacy commissioners

    Government of Canada

    priv.gc.ca
    December 7, 2023

    Principles for responsible, trustworthy and privacy-protective generative AI

    Canada's privacy regulators set out how existing privacy law applies to organizations that use generative AI: have legal authority for the personal information that goes in, be open about it, protect it, and limit sharing personal, sensitive or confidential information with these tools.

    Read the original ↗

In the provinces

The specific duties on employers are provincial. These are in force now.

  1. Province of Ontario

    Provincial law

    Employment Standards Act, 2000 · Working for Workers Four Act, 2024
    In force January 1, 2026

    AI in hiring must be disclosed in job postings

    An Ontario employer with 25 or more employees must say in every publicly advertised job posting whether it uses AI to screen, assess or select applicants, including when a recruiter does it on the employer's behalf. A plain statement that AI is used is enough.

    Read the original ↗
  2. Province of Ontario

    Provincial law

    Employment Standards Act, 2000 · Working for Workers Act, 2022
    In force October 11, 2022

    A written policy on electronic monitoring of employees

    An Ontario employer with 25 or more employees must have a written policy saying whether, how and in what circumstances it monitors employees electronically, and what it uses the information for, and must give employees a copy.

    Read the original ↗
  3. Province of Quebec

    Provincial law

    Private-sector privacy Act (CQLR c. P-39.1), s. 12.1 · Law 25
    In force September 22, 2023

    Decisions made only by automated processing must be disclosed

    A business that makes a decision about a person based only on automated processing of their personal information must tell them, and on request explain the information and the main factors used, and let them put their case to a person who can review the decision.

    Read the original ↗

In the courts and tribunals

Two British Columbia decisions that put the consequences of AI on the business that used it.

  1. Civil Resolution Tribunal of British Columbia

    Court or tribunal

    Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149
    February 14, 2024

    A business answers for what its chatbot tells customers

    Air Canada's website chatbot told a customer he could claim a bereavement fare after travelling; the airline's own policy said otherwise. The tribunal rejected the argument that the chatbot was responsible for its own words and ordered Air Canada to pay the difference.

    Read the original ↗
  2. Supreme Court of British Columbia

    Court or tribunal

    Zhang v. Chen, 2024 BCSC 285
    February 2024

    Invented case law, and the lawyer pays the costs

    A lawyer filed an application citing two cases that ChatGPT had invented. The court held her personally liable for the costs of the application, to compensate the other side for the work of finding out the cases did not exist.

    Read the original ↗

What the numbers say

Statistics Canada's counts of AI in Canadian businesses and jobs.

  1. Statistics Canada

    Research

    Canadian Survey on Working Conditions · Labour Statistics at a Glance
    June 17, 2026

    About 1 in 5 workers used generative AI in their job

    From September 2024 to July 2025, 22% of Canadian workers said they had used generative AI in their main job or business in the previous 12 months. The share rose from 17% at the start of the survey to 30% at the end.

    Read the original ↗
  2. Statistics Canada

    Research

    Canadian Survey on Business Conditions, second quarter of 2026
    2026

    19% of businesses use AI to produce goods or deliver services

    In spring 2026, 19.2% of Canadian businesses said they had used AI to produce goods or deliver services in the previous year, up from 6.1% two years earlier. The question is about AI used in making or delivering what the business sells, not every tool staff use.

    Read the original ↗

Reviewed October 4, 2026. The summaries are Standard Practice’s own reading of public documents and are not legal advice. The marks identify the kind of source and are ours; no government body, court or research organization has reviewed or endorsed this assessment.